Essays

In the Presence of the Plague. The Political Aesthetics of the Hysterical Gesture in Mette Ingvartsen’s The Dancing Public

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21827/ejtp.7.2.43034

Keywords:

biosecurity, Covid-19, Mette Ingvartsen, choreomania, performativity, hysteria, politics of dissensus

Abstract

What can an infectious disease reveal about the body as a site for political contestation? Departing from Antonin Artaud’s insistence on the affinity between death and art, this article examines the critical and subversive potential of post-Covid-19 dance performances through an analysis of Mette Ingvartsen’s performance, The Dancing Public (2021). Her exploration of the transmissibility of bodily gestures and the dynamics of close-quarter contact after a year of social distancing will be compared to Giorgio Agamben’s critique of the Covid-19 biosecurity state as well as to Jacques Rancière’s notion of the emancipated spectator. In tracing and re-enacting the tradition of choreomania and hysteria as a mute bodily testimony of past suffering and injustice, Ingvartsen establishes the power of dance as an emancipatory outlet and an affirmation of the living body as a political being.

Author Biography

Marina Srnka, Department of Literature, UAntwerpen, Antwerp, Belgium

Marina Srnka is a dance researcher currently affiliated with the University of Antwerp, where she works on the DanceMap project. She is also a critic, writing reviews for Pzazz (Belgium), Dance Context Webzine (Czech Republic), and Springback Magazine (Ireland). She has an MA in European Literary Cultures from the Universities of Bologna and Strasbourg, and an MA in Cultural Studies from KU Leuven. Her main interests lie in the intersection between body culture, cultural history, and critical theory.

Published

2026-09-21

Issue

Section

Essays